Tokenizing businesses: capital structure and compliance framework
27/11/2025
Among the forms of assets associated with the real economy, enterprises are the group with the potential to digitize economic benefits in a standardized, controlled and transparent way. Tokenization here is understood as the encoding of information and rules for distributing benefits related to business operations (revenue, profit, property rights arising from contracts, etc.), to support management, information disclosure and the ability to mobilize resources within the legal framework at the time of implementation.
In Vietnam, it is necessary to distinguish which structures represent equity ownership, the right to benefit from business results or similar rights to shares/bonds, which will be regulated by securities law and enterprise law.
What does business tokenization include?
A business may consider incorporating a data and benefits distribution mechanism associated with:
Tangible assets: machinery, equipment, inventory, factories (except for assets with registered usage rights according to regulations of specialized laws).
The level and manner of expression must closely follow the ownership rights, property rights and restrictions (if any) according to the law and the Charter and regulations of the enterprise; do not interpret beyond the scope of legal rights.
General distinction with material goods
Benefits associated with physical goods (e.g. agricultural products, metals) often have a direct basis for valuation. In contrast, benefits associated with businesses depend on finance - operations - law, so valuation is more complex and requires careful consideration and clear distinction of which factors fall within the scope of securities.
The difference between “tangible goods rights” and “business rights”
Rights attached to tangible goods (e.g. agricultural products, metals, etc.) often have a clearer basis for valuation and depend mainly on the commodity market at that time. In contrast, rights attached to enterprises depend on the financial situation, management, operations, legal obligations to be complied with and other relevant factors. Therefore, valuation becomes complicated and in some cases may arise factors that need to be considered under the relevant legal framework within the scope of securities if the rights represent ownership rights, rights to benefit from business results or rights similar to shares/bonds.
The determination of the above benefits is carried out by the competent authority and is considered based on the actual nature of the benefits, not just based on the name.
“Tokenizing doesn't change the nature of assets; it just makes rights verifiable, programmable, and distributed in a timely manner.” — Eric Wang
When is it considered a security?
According to the provisions of the Law on Securities of Vietnam, the types of assets are considered securities if they include: (i) Stocks, bonds, fund certificates, (ii) Warrants, covered warrants, stock purchase rights, depository certificates, (iii) Derivative securities or (iv) other types of securities prescribed by the Government.
Depending on each type of securities, the law will specifically regulate the definition and management regime, and all offering/listing/transaction activities must meet the conditions, records and relevant information disclosure regime (if any) as prescribed. Therefore, when assessing whether an asset or interest is a security or not, enterprises need to base on the nature and current legal regulations.
4 reference approaches
The content below is for reference only and serves as a basis for orientation. Enterprises still need to consult and assess the opinions of relevant experts before applying:
Revenue sharing: Record – reconcile – distribute a proportion of revenue from existing contracts. This model does not change the ownership structure but still has to prove the legal source of revenue and fully comply with accounting and tax regulations.
Profit sharing: The participants' benefits are linked to actual business results. Due to its similar characteristics to dividend distribution, this model is likely to be considered related to financial benefits under the scope of securities law. Therefore, enterprises need to review and strictly comply with accounting and auditing standards and fully disclose information according to relevant legal regulations.
Property rights from contracts: businesses canDigitizing rights arising from contracts (lease, supply, sale, credit, etc.). However, for this form, businesses need to pay attention to the terms of transfer of rights, notification procedures or consultation with related parties and ensure compliance with relevant legal regulations.
Instruments within the scope of securities: For assets such as shares, bonds, purchase rights, etc., full compliance with securities regulations must be ensured and only implemented when the enterprise has met the conditions for licensing/supervision under securities laws.
The process of suggesting business tokenization
Step 1 – Legal assessment of rights and assets Verify ownership, transfer restrictions, disputes, relevant contract terms.
Step 2 – Standard pricing Apply appropriate IFRS/GAAP: historical data, existing cash flows – projections, discount factors, industry risks; have a periodic update mechanism.
Step 3 – Design the benefit mechanism Clearly describe the scope of the rights recognized (revenue, profit, contract rights, or financial instruments) under economic and legal nature. Limit confusing terminology.
Step 5 – Information Disclosure Present the model, risks, valuation method, and monitoring mechanism. In case of securities elements, prepare the corresponding documents (e.g., prospectus) according to legal requirements.
Step 6 – Controlled Distribution Identify subjects, scope, and territory; comply with regulations on anti-money laundering, foreign exchange, and tax; establish appropriate KYC/AML procedures.
The digitalization of economic rights, if implemented properly, can help increase transparency, improve information disclosure discipline, reduce dependence on a few traditional capital channels and expand cooperation capabilities. The level of achievement depends on the legal profile, accounting and auditing systems and management capacity of each enterprise.
Conclude
“Tokenizing” a business should be understood as a roadmap for data governance and compliance, not a goal of raising capital at all costs. The three core principles include: legal standards, accounting and auditing as the foundation, and technology as the tool. Before implementing any structure related to the distribution of benefits or calling for resources, businesses need independent legal opinions, full review of regulations on securities, civil, foreign exchange, tax and only operate when meeting licensing conditions.
This series of articles is for sharing knowledge and information, not for investment recommendations or financial product offerings, not for legal analysis or predictions, but focuses on sharing about technology, economics, and investment. The contents referring to regulations, if any, will be written based on existing legal principles, the parts without detailed regulations will be explained and mentioned based on experience in countries that have implemented them in practice. Readers need to proactively read and understand the current policies and legal framework of Vietnam through official documents; at the same time, need to comply with the current legal framework and only operate when specifically licensed, cautiously and responsibly towards the State, community, and society.
Creative innovation is entering an era where the core value lies not only in the original work, but also in the exploitation rights that can be extended over time and space. From music, movies, fictional characters to images, designs, content […]
The F&B (Food & Beverage) industry in Vietnam is growing strongly, with an estimated scale of tens of billions of USD per year with a large number of stores, brands and franchise models. Along with the opportunities are familiar "bottlenecks": capital needs for expansion, operating costs […]
“Tokenize” in the international context is often understood as a way to standardize and digitize the economic benefits associated with an asset. This article shares perspectives on an effective tokenization model, which can bring many benefits if applied in the future: organizations […]
In the process of digitizing the supply chain, physical goods are being considered by many organizations as a suitable object to “Tokenize” (represent in the form of digital certificates). In Vietnam, the strengths in gold, coffee, pepper, cashew, seafood, rubber, etc. open up the possibility of research […]
Since 2025, many organizations in Vietnam have begun to pay more attention to digitizing data on real-world assets (often abbreviated as RWA). Similar to the way e-commerce or financial technology has created new standards for […]
In the next few years, the “digital representation” of real-world assets (often abbreviated as RWA – Real World Asset) will be mentioned as a direction for economic infrastructure development. Simply put, this is a way to use technology to standardize data on assets […]
Over the past two years, Vietnam’s legal and policy framework for blockchain and digital assets has made significant progress: from being virtually unregulated, it has now been officially mentioned in many documents. These orientations go hand in hand with […]
The world is entering a decade of reshaping the financial system. If the 2017–2021 crypto wave laid the foundation for “purely digital” assets, then the period 2025–2035 will be the era of Real World Assets (RWA) – real assets digitized on the blockchain. At that time, familiar values will be […]
In recent years, RWA (Real World Assets – real assets digitized and put on the blockchain) has emerged as an important direction of global finance. At the international level, institutions such as BlackRock, JPMorgan, HSBC, Fidelity or a16z have entered the playing field […]
In a market economy, capital mobilization is the lifeblood of businesses and the entire economy. However, in Vietnam, this phrase is often associated with negative concepts such as “financial pyramid schemes”, “fraud” or “illegal mobilization”. This misunderstanding not only […]